Skip to content

Conversation

joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@joshtriplett joshtriplett commented Jul 16, 2025

The hint-mostly-unused call for testing got merged before the change in Cargo's
git repo had been synced to rust-lang/rust. That sync is happening in
rust-lang/rust#143998 .

As soon as that change goes in and the new nightlies are built, this PR should
go in.

Rendered

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member Author

@ehuss I think this should be merged now.

@joshtriplett joshtriplett force-pushed the hint-note-nightly-version-needed branch from ca7d10c to d2ae6e6 Compare July 16, 2025 17:50
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 16, 2025

We should wait for the nightly to be published, no?

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member Author

@Kobzol That would have been an ideal thing to have done before the original post was up, yes. :)

As it stands, the post is already up, and this PR adds a date for what nightly you actually need, and an additional warning to not set it in RUSTFLAGS.

Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! It looks like it should be available now.

@ehuss ehuss merged commit 51c1bd4 into rust-lang:master Jul 17, 2025
5 checks passed
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 17, 2025

@Kobzol That would have been an ideal thing to have done before the original post was up, yes. :)

As it stands, the post is already up, and this PR adds a date for what nightly you actually need, and an additional warning to not set it in RUSTFLAGS.

I just wanted to avoid further confusion, because if you did rustup update nightly yesterday, you would see this:

info: syncing channel updates for 'nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
info: latest update on 2025-07-16, rust version 1.90.0-nightly (... 2025-07-15)

Rustup prints "latest update on <today>", but the actual installed nightly version is from the day before. So it's a bit confusing (it has certainly confused me). As people might have thought that they already have the right version if they updated nightly yesterday, and the blog post told them that they need -16.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants